|
Choices - Are We Drowning?
Choices: they seem to be
multiplying exponentially in every aspect of life
for Americans, from the most mundane (choosing
a supplier for your electricity) to the most life-changing
(choosing a surgeon). And everything in between
requires making choices, as people custom order,
or build, their own computers, decide how many
free minutes they need on their cell phone service
plan, and visit sleep-away camps to decide which
is the best for their ten-year-old child. Even
decisions as to what to eat in order to stay healthy
are increasingly complicated, given the continually
changing information that is put forth in the
media. It is likely that we will one day be faced
with choosing what gene therapies to use for ourselves,
our children, and even our babies in utero—and
we will have to decide if these therapies are
truly therapeutic or largely for enhancement.
Americans have been living with the blessing and
curse of myriad choices for a long time.
The Consumer Style Inventory, which was first
created in 1986, elucidates eight mental characteristics
of consumers—one of which is “confused
by overchoice.” This Inventory was recently
conducted in China, where the consumer market
is expanding rapidly, and it was found that one
in three consumers was “confused by overchoice”.
It will be interesting to watch, over time if,
as Chinese consumers become more used to an array
of choices in products and services, they become
more comfortable when presented with myriad choices.
It is possible that the expansion of the middle
class in many countries and the concurrent expansion
of the numbers and types of products and services
available to consumers will create many more “confused”
shoppers. On the other hand, once variety and
choice become accepted and expected in the marketplace,
then their lack can create a sense of deprivation.
Consumer behavior is most certainly affected
by the presence of numerous choices in the marketplace.
The ways in which individuals react to choice
has the potential to be useful in profiling customers.
But the way a person reacts to having choices
in one area, such as health care, may be different
from the way that same person reacts to having
choices in cleaning products. Do people necessarily
avail themselves of options when presented with
them?
In some arenas, the availability of choice has
the potential to cause harm. Concern has been
voiced that employee health care plans that make
workers responsible for considering costs in choosing
health services may lead to people scrimping on
medical care that is necessary. There has been
much written of late, also, about the potential
dangers of privatizing social security and allowing
people to make their own investment decisions.
In yet another area, the abundance of knowledge
that is now available to everyone—from which
people must choose what to absorb and use—and
the concurrent belief that anyone can now become
a success because of that, has led to a pervasive
fear of failure in knowledge societies.
It is not only people that must make choices
in our increasingly complex world. Machines, too,
are beginning to be faced with choices. There
is now so much information on PCs that the desktop
metaphor is becoming obsolete. These computers
need a new way to manage and file all
the choices that are available for inclusion in
memory and hard drive. “Parasitic computing”
enables one computer to co-opt another to perform
computations, unbeknownst to that computer’s
owner, and potentially slowing down the host computer.
IBM is working to develop autonomic computing,
which will enable systems to solve their own problems—without
human intervention. Presence awareness, a new
concept in software development, lets devices
automatically detect other devices on a network.
|