|
Linux, a free operating system, will soon become
the number 1 version of Unix (an approach at the
opposite end of Microsoft, which keeps the system
trends). Increasingly, firms may give away
Web-based services to fuel product sales on their
sites or gain revenue from advertisements. While
drug companies widely advertise their prescription
drugs, employers and health plans are pushing
cheaper generics. Private label makers have long
been gaining shelf space against such powerful
brand names as Kellogg and Nabisco, and supermarkets
earn 25% more on store brands even though they
are priced 10% to 24% below name brands. Day traders
now account for 12% of Nasdaq volume, putting
pressure on the big market makers to trim their
spread, saving investors billions of dollars.
Digital distribution of content, like music, makes
pirating - free and unauthorized downloading of
information - commonplace. Deregulation of the
energy utilities is sending companies scrambling
to keep old customers and find new ones as lowest
cost begins to erode monopolistic pricing. Even
low-income areas, where the few retailers who
remained charged higher prices and were able to
corner the $85 billion spent there, are now becoming
attractive to lower-price chains.
Fast travel and the Internet make global comparison
shopping a reality, forcing an entire country,
like Britain, to lower prices in all categories
from cars to supermarkets. The Net allows consumers
everywhere to find the lowest price anywhere through
comparisons and auctions, and within 25 years,
businesses and individuals will use mobile intelligent
agents routinely to perform tasks like shopping
and negotiating on line. In one simulation of
the upcoming digital marketplace, the cyber economy
degenerated into vicious price wars and market
crashes. For now, more and more consumers are
getting a free ride from retailers because customers
go into stores to see, feel, experience and learn
about products, then go home and order them at
the best prices over the Internet.
Lowest cost has made companies, but it can break
them, because of an even lower cost and more convenient
entrant. Witness the quick rise and then serious
problems of CompUSA, as the category killers get
killed by on-line and other lower cost operators.
Competing on the basis of least cost has become
a dangerously short-lived game, but for a while,
it looks like, if the volume is right, the profits
are guaranteed, and so companies seek to cut costs
everywhere through the value and production chain
in order to get to the consumer as cheaply as
possible.
Nick Graham, CEO of Joe Boxer says, ËThe brand
is the amusement park, the product is the souvenir.Ó
But even in that scenario, International Data
Corporation (IDC) predicts access to the Web in
many retail stores as well as at home, and access
to live salespeople via voice-enabled retail websites.
Thus, even clever marketing and attraction may
yield to least cost competition. Customization,
individually tailoring products and easy do-it-yourself
items from home d¾cor to health remedies to food
to artwork, may work as a differentiator for a
while, but eventually mass customization will
drive prices down here, too.
Merely generating accounting profits can be a
misleading indicator of a company"s true
financial health. EVA (economic value added) and
MVA (market value added) are increasingly attracting
CEO"s, money managers and analysts. Of interest:
None of the companies with the biggest market
caps as well as highest MVA compete as lowest
cost sellers (GE, Coca-Cola, P&G, Philip Morris,
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Microsoft, Intel, Exxon,
Pfizer).
One observer points out that the current economy
is new because of its potential to create never-ending
cost reductions driven by technological innovation.
Money is being made by selling goods for less
than they cost and relying on the learning curve
to lower your costs next year. After this phase
of a leading sector"s effects on the economy,
the focus must shift to figuring out exactly what
customers want and making sure they get it. ËIt
is possible that in an information age economy,
the businesses that enjoy the most success will
not be those that focus on making better products
but those that strive to find ways to induce consumers
to pay for what they use.
|